Difference between revisions of "User talk:WikiSysop"
From DOSBoxWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Questionable deletion) |
(→Questionable deletion: Please keep the discussion in once place) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Can you explain why you censored [http://www.dosbox.com/wiki/index.php?title=TOOLS:ScummVM&diff=next&oldid=3635 this section]? You didn't even include any edit summary. -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 18:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | Can you explain why you censored [http://www.dosbox.com/wiki/index.php?title=TOOLS:ScummVM&diff=next&oldid=3635 this section]? You didn't even include any edit summary. -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 18:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :ah yes. | ||
| + | :The scummvm people used that piece of information as proof that we prefer scummvm over dosbox for games that scummvm supports. | ||
| + | :Which is not true. | ||
| + | :Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] ([[User talk:WikiSysop|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/WikiSysop|contribs]]) 08:49, 18 October 2010</span></small> | ||
| + | ::If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me. -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:50, 4 November 2010
Questionable deletion
Can you explain why you censored this section? You didn't even include any edit summary. -Lwc 18:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- ah yes.
- The scummvm people used that piece of information as proof that we prefer scummvm over dosbox for games that scummvm supports.
- Which is not true.
- Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSysop (talk • contribs) 08:49, 18 October 2010
- If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me. -Lwc 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
