Difference between revisions of "User talk:WikiSysop"
From DOSBoxWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Questionable deletion: Please keep the discussion in once place) |
(→SPAM: new section) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] ([[User talk:WikiSysop|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/WikiSysop|contribs]]) 08:49, 18 October 2010</span></small> | :Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:WikiSysop|WikiSysop]] ([[User talk:WikiSysop|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/WikiSysop|contribs]]) 08:49, 18 October 2010</span></small> | ||
::If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me. -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | ::If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me. -[[User:Lwc|Lwc]] 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == SPAM == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Would you explain why you didn't delete pages like [http://www.dosbox.com/wiki/index.php?title=Cpu%2Fcore%2FIntro&action=historysubmit&diff=2253&oldid=2249]? Protecting and blanking is of course enough but since the wiki has such a strength "captcha" now it might be worth to delete such pages... [[User:Mabdul|Mabdul]] 11:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:28, 17 March 2013
Questionable deletion
Can you explain why you censored this section? You didn't even include any edit summary. -Lwc 18:42, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
- ah yes.
- The scummvm people used that piece of information as proof that we prefer scummvm over dosbox for games that scummvm supports.
- Which is not true.
- Especially the last part of that section is totally not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiSysop (talk • contribs) 08:49, 18 October 2010
- If they "use" unofficial wiki information, it's their problem. But who said the last part is totally not true? It sounds true enough for me. -Lwc 23:50, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
SPAM
Would you explain why you didn't delete pages like [1]? Protecting and blanking is of course enough but since the wiki has such a strength "captcha" now it might be worth to delete such pages... Mabdul 11:28, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
